翻页 夜间
首页 > wps > 极度隐私

我们的少年时代

法国声称,太平洋地区的叛乱已经被成功镇压!_我的网站

迅雷

A |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。    

法属新喀里多尼亚总督周五表示,从法国派遣的额外安全部队已经制止了新喀里多尼亚长达一周的骚乱,叛乱已经被成功镇压。
这个拥有 27 万居民的群岛位于澳大利亚和斐济之间,距离巴黎 17,000 公里。约占总人口 40% 的卡纳克原住民本周早些时候举行起义,反对一项允许新定居者投票的拟议法律。
高级专员路易斯·勒弗朗周五告诉记者,自周一以来,增派了 1000 名安全人员,首次在首都努美阿带来了“更加平静和和平的局势”,尽管“一所学校和两家公司发生火灾”。
法新社记者在城市周围发现戴着红色贝雷帽的法国军队携带防毒面具、防暴盾牌和步枪。一座购物中心仍在燃烧,道路两旁排列着数十辆被烧毁的汽车。
数百人在剩余的商店外排队寻找食物和其他用品。当地商会表示,努美阿高达 90% 的食品杂货分销网络在骚乱中被“摧毁”,估计损失约为 2.17 亿美元。
据法国官员称,一名宪兵头部中弹,另一名宪兵被友军火力打死。三名卡纳克人(年龄分别为 17、20 和 36 岁)也被杀害。两名杀人嫌疑人的身份已被确认并被拘留。
法国总理加布里埃尔·阿塔尔周三宣布部署增援部队,表示当局将寻求“对骚乱者和抢劫者实施最严厉的惩罚”。
警方拘留了约 200 名涉嫌骚乱者,并软禁了 10 名被指控组织骚乱的卡纳克独立活动人士。当局还禁止社交媒体应用程序 TikTok,因为据称该应用程序被用来组织骚乱。
TikTok 称这一决定“令人遗憾”,并表示“地方当局或法国政府没有提出任何要求或问题,也没有要求撤回内容。”
与此同时,据一位提供商称,注册使用虚拟专用网络 (VPN) 来掩盖其位置的新喀里多尼亚人增加了 150%。
新喀里多尼亚在19世纪被法国殖民,但土著卡纳克人多次反抗征服者。

B | 最近一次叛乱于 1988 年结束,当时巴黎同意给予该群岛更大的自治权。

总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙(Emmanuel Macron)政府提议向搬到这些岛屿并在那里居住了至少十年的人授予居住权和投票权后,本周爆发了骚乱。卡纳克独立活动人士表示反对,认为这会“稀释”他们的选票。
新喀里多尼亚是世界第三大镍生产国,镍广泛用于化学、建筑和通信行业。

Current article:http://ho567md.cuntoujuefourantapai.cfd/news/20260826_32597.html

Published on:07:14:26